<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Double-Deckers for Epsom Buses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://londonbuspageinexile.wordpress.com/2007/07/29/double-deckers-for-epsom-buses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://londonbuspageinexile.wordpress.com/2007/07/29/double-deckers-for-epsom-buses/</link>
	<description>The London Bus Page lives on.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 03:45:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: morten</title>
		<link>http://londonbuspageinexile.wordpress.com/2007/07/29/double-deckers-for-epsom-buses/#comment-6485</link>
		<dc:creator>morten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 12:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://londonbuspageinexile.wordpress.com/2007/07/29/double-deckers-for-epsom-buses/#comment-6485</guid>
		<description>i think between about 3 and 7 the 163 between morden and wimbledon should be double decker and i agree with Andy, 19, the enviros are the ugliest buses i have ever seen, well at least the 400&#039;s are</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think between about 3 and 7 the 163 between morden and wimbledon should be double decker and i agree with Andy, 19, the enviros are the ugliest buses i have ever seen, well at least the 400&#8217;s are</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Two^Sixteen &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Review Friday: The 406</title>
		<link>http://londonbuspageinexile.wordpress.com/2007/07/29/double-deckers-for-epsom-buses/#comment-6288</link>
		<dc:creator>Two^Sixteen &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Review Friday: The 406</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 00:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://londonbuspageinexile.wordpress.com/2007/07/29/double-deckers-for-epsom-buses/#comment-6288</guid>
		<description>[...] taken from a blog about london buses [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] taken from a blog about london buses [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GB</title>
		<link>http://londonbuspageinexile.wordpress.com/2007/07/29/double-deckers-for-epsom-buses/#comment-5236</link>
		<dc:creator>GB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 06:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://londonbuspageinexile.wordpress.com/2007/07/29/double-deckers-for-epsom-buses/#comment-5236</guid>
		<description>#24 I wonder whether routes 482 &amp; 350 will participate in the Heathrow Freeflow scheme. Currently routes 435 &amp; X26 do not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#24 I wonder whether routes 482 &amp; 350 will participate in the Heathrow Freeflow scheme. Currently routes 435 &amp; X26 do not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://londonbuspageinexile.wordpress.com/2007/07/29/double-deckers-for-epsom-buses/#comment-5012</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 12:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://londonbuspageinexile.wordpress.com/2007/07/29/double-deckers-for-epsom-buses/#comment-5012</guid>
		<description># 23 - That&#039;s a long extension on the 382 - Southgate to Heathrow, what would the PVR be, think you meant 482 Southall to Heathrow</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p># 23 &#8211; That&#8217;s a long extension on the 382 &#8211; Southgate to Heathrow, what would the PVR be, think you meant 482 Southall to Heathrow</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ctrh136</title>
		<link>http://londonbuspageinexile.wordpress.com/2007/07/29/double-deckers-for-epsom-buses/#comment-4789</link>
		<dc:creator>ctrh136</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 13:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://londonbuspageinexile.wordpress.com/2007/07/29/double-deckers-for-epsom-buses/#comment-4789</guid>
		<description>I went on one of First&#039;s 3 year old VNWs and I thought that it was not in good condition at all and it seemed worn out. #22, the SOs are better with the leather seats but there should be more at the top deck back, also what sort of buses will Transdev get from the 382 to Heathrow (as leather would get damaged)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went on one of First&#8217;s 3 year old VNWs and I thought that it was not in good condition at all and it seemed worn out. #22, the SOs are better with the leather seats but there should be more at the top deck back, also what sort of buses will Transdev get from the 382 to Heathrow (as leather would get damaged)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ejc</title>
		<link>http://londonbuspageinexile.wordpress.com/2007/07/29/double-deckers-for-epsom-buses/#comment-4776</link>
		<dc:creator>ejc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 11:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://londonbuspageinexile.wordpress.com/2007/07/29/double-deckers-for-epsom-buses/#comment-4776</guid>
		<description>Thankyou #21, as soon as i&#039;d asked the question i worked that out! I was having a bit of a blond day! 

Has anyone travelled on them yet? They&#039;re a real step up in quality- proper leather seats, with cushions! Fantastically comfortable, although the ride is typical Scania- on the crashing side. The build quality seems a little better than previous East Lancs offerings, but still not up to the standard of WrightBus. 

They suit the TLU livery very well too- very smart looking. I for one am glad they&#039;re not going for the all-over red that their SP&#039;s carry...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thankyou #21, as soon as i&#8217;d asked the question i worked that out! I was having a bit of a blond day! </p>
<p>Has anyone travelled on them yet? They&#8217;re a real step up in quality- proper leather seats, with cushions! Fantastically comfortable, although the ride is typical Scania- on the crashing side. The build quality seems a little better than previous East Lancs offerings, but still not up to the standard of WrightBus. </p>
<p>They suit the TLU livery very well too- very smart looking. I for one am glad they&#8217;re not going for the all-over red that their SP&#8217;s carry&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ctrh136</title>
		<link>http://londonbuspageinexile.wordpress.com/2007/07/29/double-deckers-for-epsom-buses/#comment-4742</link>
		<dc:creator>ctrh136</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 14:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://londonbuspageinexile.wordpress.com/2007/07/29/double-deckers-for-epsom-buses/#comment-4742</guid>
		<description>#20, because of the extension of the 131 to Tooting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#20, because of the extension of the 131 to Tooting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ejc</title>
		<link>http://londonbuspageinexile.wordpress.com/2007/07/29/double-deckers-for-epsom-buses/#comment-4587</link>
		<dc:creator>ejc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 01:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://londonbuspageinexile.wordpress.com/2007/07/29/double-deckers-for-epsom-buses/#comment-4587</guid>
		<description>On a completley different subject, anyone know why the 148 has got MORE new Scania&#039;s, albeit to a different (and much better) design....??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a completley different subject, anyone know why the 148 has got MORE new Scania&#8217;s, albeit to a different (and much better) design&#8230;.??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://londonbuspageinexile.wordpress.com/2007/07/29/double-deckers-for-epsom-buses/#comment-4442</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 17:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://londonbuspageinexile.wordpress.com/2007/07/29/double-deckers-for-epsom-buses/#comment-4442</guid>
		<description>Aren&#039;t these modern vehicles ugly!
These look like they&#039;ve got Male Pattern Baldness!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aren&#8217;t these modern vehicles ugly!<br />
These look like they&#8217;ve got Male Pattern Baldness!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://londonbuspageinexile.wordpress.com/2007/07/29/double-deckers-for-epsom-buses/#comment-4425</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 21:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://londonbuspageinexile.wordpress.com/2007/07/29/double-deckers-for-epsom-buses/#comment-4425</guid>
		<description>London Buses (through East Thames Buses) has been responsible for considerable dead mileage by basing buses in Belvedere for routes like the 108 and 185.

In the same area the 453 generates lots of expensive empty miles between Plumstead and Deptford.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>London Buses (through East Thames Buses) has been responsible for considerable dead mileage by basing buses in Belvedere for routes like the 108 and 185.</p>
<p>In the same area the 453 generates lots of expensive empty miles between Plumstead and Deptford.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
